The Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, is widely regarded as the most important scientific book ever written. It contains Newton’s laws of motion, his law of universal gravitation, his derivation of Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, his theory of tides, his calculation of the speed of sound, and the mathematical framework that would govern physics for over two centuries. It is the foundation of classical mechanics and the model for all subsequent mathematical physics.
It almost did not get published. The story of how the Principia came into existence involves one persistent astronomer, one reclusive genius, one bitter rival, and a series of obstacles that nearly prevented the most important work of the Scientific Revolution from reaching the public.
Newton Before the Principia
By the early 1680s, Isaac Newton was 40 years old and had been Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge for over a decade. He had already made groundbreaking contributions to optics (his prism experiments proving that white light is composed of colors), mathematics (the development of calculus), and mechanics (early formulations of his laws of motion). But almost none of this work had been published.
Newton was pathologically reluctant to publish. His one major publication, a 1672 paper on light and colors, had provoked criticism from Robert Hooke and others, and the experience left Newton deeply averse to public scientific debate. He retreated into private research, spending years on optics, mathematics, alchemy, and theology without sharing his results.
By 1684, Newton had the essential ideas of universal gravitation and had derived Kepler’s laws from an inverse-square force law. But he had no intention of publishing them. The work existed only in his private notebooks and scattered manuscripts, known to no one.
The Visit from Halley
In August 1684, the young astronomer Edmond Halley (who would later become famous for predicting the return of the comet that bears his name) traveled to Cambridge to ask Newton a question. The question had arisen from a discussion in a London coffee house between Halley, Hooke, and Christopher Wren.
The question was this: if the Sun attracts the planets with a force that decreases as the square of the distance (an inverse-square law, as suggested by several lines of evidence), what shape would the planet’s orbit be?
Hooke had claimed he could derive the answer but never produced the proof. Wren offered a book worth forty shillings to anyone who could solve the problem within two months. Neither Hooke nor Halley succeeded.
When Halley asked Newton the question, Newton replied immediately: an ellipse. Halley was stunned. How did Newton know? “I have calculated it,” Newton said. He had solved the problem years earlier.
But Newton could not find the calculation among his papers. He promised to redo it and send the proof to Halley. A few months later, he sent a short manuscript titled De Motu Corporum in Gyrum (On the Motion of Bodies in Orbit), which contained the derivation.
Halley immediately recognized the significance. The manuscript was not just an answer to the coffee house question. It was the beginning of a complete theory of mechanics and gravitation. Halley urged Newton to expand the work into a full book.
The Writing
What happened next was one of the most extraordinary bursts of intellectual productivity in human history. Newton, once persuaded to write, threw himself into the work with an intensity that alarmed his colleagues. He wrote for approximately eighteen months, between late 1684 and spring 1686, producing the three books of the Principia.
During this period, Newton barely ate, barely slept, and rarely left his rooms. His assistant Humphrey Newton (no relation) reported that Newton often forgot to eat meals that were brought to him. He would sometimes rise from his desk and stand in the middle of the room, lost in thought, then sit down and continue writing without having gone anywhere. He worked through the night regularly and seemed oblivious to the passage of time.
The intellectual labor was staggering. Newton was not merely writing down ideas he had already worked out. He was developing new mathematics, solving new problems, and constructing a unified framework for all of mechanics as he wrote. Many of the propositions in the Principia were worked out for the first time during this period, including the theory of tides, the shape of the Earth, the precession of the equinoxes, and the motion of comets.
The Hooke Problem
In the middle of this work, Newton received word that Robert Hooke was claiming priority for the inverse-square law of gravitation. Hooke had corresponded with Newton in 1679 and 1680, and in those letters had suggested that planetary motion might be understood as the result of a central attractive force that decreased with the square of the distance. Hooke now claimed that Newton had taken the idea from him.
Newton was furious. While it is true that Hooke had suggested the inverse-square law in their correspondence, the suggestion was vague and unaccompanied by any mathematical derivation. Hooke had the qualitative idea but could not do the mathematics. Newton had independently arrived at the inverse-square law through his own calculations and had gone enormously further, deriving the elliptical orbits, the perturbation theory, and the entire framework of universal gravitation.
The dispute nearly derailed the Principia. Newton threatened to suppress the third book entirely, the section on the system of the world that applied his theory to the solar system and contained the most revolutionary implications. He wrote to Halley: “Philosophy is such an impertinently litigious lady that a man has as good be engaged in lawsuits as have to do with her.”
Halley spent weeks calming Newton down, acknowledging Hooke’s suggestions while emphasizing that the mathematical demonstration was entirely Newton’s. Eventually Newton agreed to add a brief acknowledgment that Hooke, Wren, and Halley had independently suggested the inverse-square law, but he removed most of the direct references to Hooke that had appeared in earlier drafts.
The Funding Crisis
Even after the manuscript was complete, publication was not assured. The Royal Society, which had agreed to publish the book, discovered that its funds were exhausted. The Society had recently spent its publication budget on a lavishly illustrated book about fish (De Historia Piscium by Francis Willughby), which had sold poorly. There was no money left for the Principia.
Halley stepped in and paid for the publication out of his own pocket. This was a significant financial sacrifice: Halley was not wealthy, and printing costs were substantial. He also handled the proofreading, the correspondence with Newton about corrections, and the logistics of production. Without Halley’s personal intervention and funding, the Principia might never have been printed.
The first edition appeared in July 1687, in a run of perhaps 300 to 400 copies. The Latin text, dense with geometric diagrams and mathematical propositions, was not easy reading even for educated contemporaries. But its impact was immediate and enormous.
Why Newton Almost Kept Silent
The near-suppression of the Principia was not an accident. It reflected deep aspects of Newton’s personality and his relationship to the scientific community.
Newton’s fear of criticism was pathological. The controversy over his 1672 optics paper had taught him that publication meant dispute, and he hated dispute more than he loved recognition. He once wrote: “I see a man must either resolve to put out nothing new, or become a slave to defend it.”
He also had little respect for most of his contemporaries. Newton believed, with considerable justification, that very few people in Europe could understand his mathematics. Publishing for an audience that could not follow his arguments seemed pointless, especially if it invited criticism from people like Hooke who understood the qualitative ideas but not the quantitative proofs.
If Halley had not visited Cambridge in 1684, asked exactly the right question, recognized the significance of Newton’s answer, and then spent three years persuading, funding, and managing the publication, the Principia might have remained in Newton’s notebooks indefinitely. The greatest scientific work of the millennium was published because one young astronomer had the curiosity to ask a question and the persistence to see the answer through to print.
The Book Itself
The Principia is organized in three books. Book I establishes the mathematical theory of motion under central forces. Book II treats the motion of bodies through resisting media (fluids). Book III, “The System of the World,” applies the theory of Books I and II to the actual solar system, demonstrating that the same gravitational force that governs falling objects on Earth also governs the motion of planets, moons, and comets.
The work is written in the style of classical geometry, with definitions, axioms, lemmas, propositions, and corollaries, deliberately modeled on Euclid’s Elements. Newton chose this format partly because geometric proofs were considered more rigorous than algebraic ones in his era, and partly because he wanted to make the work difficult enough that only competent mathematicians would attempt to read it. He told a friend that he had made the Principia deliberately hard “to avoid being baited by little smatterers in mathematics.”
Kronecker Wallis’s edition of the Principia presents this foundational text in a format that reflects its monumental importance. The book that Halley rescued from obscurity, funded from his own pocket, and shepherded through the press remains, more than three centuries later, the single most influential work in the history of science.
Newton’s private intellectual development, the notebooks and calculations that preceded the Principia, can be glimpsed in his early writings. Kronecker Wallis’s reproduction of Newton’s College Notebook preserves the records of a young mind working through the problems that would eventually produce the greatest scientific synthesis ever achieved.
What Almost Was Not
The story of the Principia‘s publication is a reminder that great works do not publish themselves. Genius is necessary but not sufficient. Newton had the ideas for years before Halley’s visit. Without the visit, without Halley’s encouragement, without his money, without his diplomacy in managing the Hooke dispute, and without his patient editing of the proofs, the Principia might have stayed in Newton’s rooms at Trinity College, known only to its author.
The history of science would have been different. Not because Newton’s ideas would never have been discovered (they would have, eventually, by someone), but because the specific synthesis of the Principia, its scope, its rigor, its audacious claim to describe the mechanics of the entire universe in a single mathematical framework, was the product of one mind working at the peak of its powers during eighteen months of sustained creative fury. That fury was ignited by Halley’s question and sustained by Halley’s support. The Principia is Newton’s masterpiece, but it is also Halley’s gift to science.
No products in the cart.