In 1887, the American physicist Albert Michelson and the chemist Edward Morley conducted what is often called the most important failed experiment in the history of science. They set out to detect the luminiferous ether, the invisible substance that 19th-century physicists believed filled all of space and served as the medium through which light waves traveled. Their experiment was precise, their apparatus was ingenious, and their result was unambiguous: the ether did not exist. Or if it did, it had no detectable effect on the speed of light.
This negative result shook physics to its foundations. It undermined the theoretical framework that had governed optics for two centuries and created a crisis that would not be resolved until Albert Einstein published his theory of special relativity in 1905. The Michelson-Morley experiment did not find what it was looking for, and by failing, it discovered something far more important.
Why Physicists Believed in the Ether
The reasoning behind the ether was straightforward. Every known wave travels through a medium. Sound waves travel through air (and cannot propagate in a vacuum). Water waves travel through water. If light is a wave, as Christiaan Huygens proposed in 1690 and as Thomas Young and Augustin Fresnel convincingly demonstrated in the early 19th century, then light must travel through something. That something was called the luminiferous ether (from the Latin lumen, light, and aether, the substance of the heavens).
The ether was supposed to be an extraordinary substance. It had to be rigid enough to transmit waves at the enormous speed of light (about 300,000 kilometers per second) but tenuous enough to offer no detectable resistance to the motion of planets and stars. It had to fill all of space, pervading every gap between atoms and extending to the most distant stars. It had to be transparent to all forms of electromagnetic radiation.
Nobody had ever detected the ether directly. But its existence was considered a logical necessity: if light is a wave, there must be a medium. The question was not whether the ether existed but how to measure its properties.
The Idea Behind the Experiment
If the ether fills all of space and the Earth moves through it (as it must, in its orbit around the Sun), then the Earth’s motion should create an “ether wind,” analogous to the wind you feel when driving in an open car. This wind should affect the measured speed of light depending on the direction of measurement.
Light traveling in the same direction as the Earth’s motion through the ether should appear slightly slower (the ether wind is “blowing” the light backward). Light traveling perpendicular to the Earth’s motion should be unaffected. The difference in speed would be tiny (the Earth moves at about 30 km/s, versus light’s 300,000 km/s), but it should be measurable with sufficiently sensitive equipment.
Michelson designed an instrument called an interferometer to detect this difference. The interferometer splits a beam of light into two perpendicular beams, sends them along equal paths, and recombines them. If the two beams travel at slightly different speeds (because of the ether wind), they will be slightly out of phase when recombined, producing an interference pattern: alternating bands of light and dark that reveal the speed difference.
The Apparatus
Michelson had already attempted the experiment in 1881 in Berlin, using a relatively small interferometer. The results were inconclusive: the expected effect was smaller than the instrument’s margin of error. For the 1887 experiment, he teamed up with Morley and built a much larger and more sensitive apparatus at the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.
The interferometer was mounted on a massive sandstone slab, which floated on a pool of mercury to eliminate vibration and allow the apparatus to be rotated smoothly. The light paths were extended using multiple mirrors, giving an effective path length of about 11 meters in each direction. The apparatus was sensitive enough to detect a speed difference of less than one part in ten billion.
Michelson and Morley took measurements at different times of day and at different seasons (to account for the changing direction of the Earth’s orbital motion). They rotated the apparatus to compare the speed of light in different directions. They repeated the measurements many times to reduce random errors.
The Result
The result was null. No difference in the speed of light was detected in any direction, at any time. The expected interference pattern shift was about 0.4 fringes (based on the known speed of the Earth’s orbit). The observed shift was less than 0.02 fringes, well within the experimental uncertainty. For all practical purposes, the result was zero.
The ether wind did not exist. Or if it did, its effect on the speed of light was far smaller than any reasonable theory predicted.
The scientific community was stunned. The experiment was so carefully designed and so precisely executed that the result could not be attributed to experimental error. Something was wrong with the theoretical framework.
Attempts to Save the Ether
Physicists did not immediately abandon the ether. Several explanations were proposed to reconcile the null result with the ether hypothesis.
Ether drag: perhaps the Earth drags the ether along with it, so there is no relative motion between the Earth and the nearby ether. But this hypothesis conflicted with the observed phenomenon of stellar aberration (the slight apparent shift in star positions due to the Earth’s motion), which required the ether to be stationary relative to the stars.
The Lorentz contraction: in 1892, the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz proposed that objects moving through the ether are physically contracted in the direction of motion by precisely the amount needed to cancel the expected interference pattern shift. George FitzGerald had independently proposed the same idea. The Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction “saved” the ether by explaining away the null result, but it was an ad hoc hypothesis with no independent justification.
Lorentz eventually developed a comprehensive mathematical framework (the Lorentz transformations) that described how measurements of length, time, and mass change for objects moving through the ether. The mathematics was correct, but the physical interpretation (everything is relative to the stationary ether) was about to be overturned.
Einstein’s Solution (1905)
In 1905, Albert Einstein published his theory of special relativity. Einstein took a radically different approach to the problem. Instead of trying to explain the Michelson-Morley result within the ether framework, he simply dispensed with the ether altogether.
Einstein proposed two postulates. First, the laws of physics are the same for all observers moving at constant velocity (the principle of relativity). Second, the speed of light in vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion or the motion of the light source.
The second postulate is the key. If the speed of light is the same in all directions for all observers, then the Michelson-Morley result is not a failure but a confirmation: the experiment found no ether wind because there is no ether wind. The speed of light does not depend on the observer’s motion because it is a fundamental constant of nature, not a wave speed relative to a medium.
From these two postulates, Einstein derived the Lorentz transformations (the same mathematics that Lorentz had developed, but with a completely different interpretation), time dilation, length contraction, the equivalence of mass and energy (E = mc²), and the entire framework of special relativity.
Did Einstein Know About the Experiment?
Whether Einstein was directly influenced by the Michelson-Morley experiment has been debated for over a century. Einstein’s own statements on the subject were inconsistent. In some accounts, he said the experiment played an important role in his thinking. In others, he downplayed its influence, saying he was motivated primarily by theoretical considerations (the incompatibility between Maxwell’s electrodynamics and Newtonian mechanics).
What is clear is that the Michelson-Morley result was widely known in the physics community by the time Einstein developed special relativity. Whether Einstein arrived at his theory independently or was influenced by the experimental evidence, the experiment provided the empirical foundation that special relativity needed. Without Michelson-Morley, Einstein’s postulates might have seemed arbitrary. With it, they were almost inevitable.
Michelson’s Recognition
Michelson received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1907, the first American to win a scientific Nobel. The prize was awarded not specifically for the ether experiment but for his development of precision optical instruments and the measurements he made with them. Michelson continued to work on precision optics for decades, measuring the speed of light with increasing accuracy and contributing to the definition of the standard meter.
The interferometer design that Michelson developed for the ether experiment has found applications far beyond its original purpose. Modern versions of the Michelson interferometer are used in spectrometry, telecommunications, and most dramatically in the LIGO experiment, which detected gravitational waves for the first time in 2015. LIGO uses laser interferometers with arm lengths of four kilometers, but the principle is identical to what Michelson built in 1887.
The Value of Finding Nothing
The Michelson-Morley experiment is the supreme example of a negative result that transforms science. Michelson and Morley set out to measure a property of the ether and found that the ether does not exist. Their failure to detect what they were looking for led directly to the greatest revolution in physics since Newton.
The wave theory of light that predicted the ether traces back to Huygens’s Treatise on Light, published in 1690. Huygens’s wave theory was brilliantly successful in explaining reflection, refraction, and double refraction. Its one weakness was the ether: the medium it required did not exist. The Michelson-Morley experiment revealed that weakness, and Einstein eliminated it.
Newton’s competing particle theory of light, described in his Opticks, did not require an ether, but it could not explain interference and diffraction. The resolution, which came in the twentieth century with quantum mechanics, is that light has both wave and particle properties. Both Newton and Huygens were partly right, and both were partly wrong. The experiment that revealed the limits of both theories was performed in a basement in Cleveland, on a sandstone slab floating on mercury.
No products in the cart.